top of page

 Seafood FrauD

​​Fish Fraud: The Deception on Your Plate
 

Fish Fraud

Seafood is one of the most globally traded food products — and one of the most frequently mislabeled.

 

Fish fraud happens when seafood is sold under the wrong name, intentionally or through opaque supply chains.

 

Lower-value fish may be marketed as premium species, farmed fish labeled as wild-caught, or illegally caught fish relabeled before reaching consumers.

 

This deception hides overfishing, undermines sustainable fisheries, and prevents consumers from making informed choices.

 

Without transparency in the seafood supply chain, illegal and unethical practices can easily enter the global market undetected.

What Does Judaism say?

 

לֹ֖א תִּגְנֹ֑בוּ וְלֹא־תְכַחֲשׁ֥וּ וְלֹֽא־תְשַׁקְּר֖וּ אִ֥ישׁ בַּעֲמִיתֽוֹ׃ 

You shall not steal; you shall not deal deceitfully or falsely with one another.

Leviticus 19:11

אסור לרמות בני אדם במקח וממכר או לגנוב דעתם

It is forbidden to defraud a person in commerce or to mislead them.

Shulchan Arukh, Choshen Mishpat 228

Seafood fraud, mislabeling or misrepresenting fish, is a clear violation of Jewish law, which prohibits deception and mandates honesty in commerce. Our tradition forbids not only outright lies but any practice that creates a false impression about a product’s identity, origin, or quality. Beyond the ethical breach, such deception can pose serious physical danger. If a person unknowingly consumes mislabeled seafood, it may expose them to allergens or other health risks, raising concerns of Safek Sakana, the possibility of danger, under the obligation of Pikuach Nefesh, to save a life.  Thus, seafood fraud is both a moral violation and a potential threat to human health in the eyes of Jewish tradition. 

Most Mislabeled fish species

In a 2025 scientific journal paper was published on ScienceDirect by Sarah Ahles, et al. found that nearly 39.1% of seafood products in the United States are mislabeled when compared to their true species identity, based on DNA and market studies of 4,179 samples across 32 states. The most common form of mislabeling was species substitution, occurring in over a quarter of samples, followed by inappropriate or conflicting market names. While the most popular seafoods consumed in the U.S. had lower substitution rates than less-common species, the overall prevalence of mislabeling highlights significant transparency issues in seafood supply chains and underscores the need for stronger labeling standards and enforcement.

640x427-Snapper-Red-NOAAFisheries_edited.png

Red Snapper
Lutjanus campechanus

The most documented case of seafood fraud worldwide. Frequently substituted with tilapia, rockfish, vermilion snapper, or other less expensive species.

Bluefin-big_edited.png

Tuna
Bluefin & Canned

High-value species like Atlantic and Pacific bluefin are often substituted with yellowfin, bigeye, escolar (sometimes sold as “white tuna”), or other tuna species.

chilean sea bass_edited.png

Sea Bass
(Chilean Sea Bass)

Dissostichus eleginoides

Particularly Chilean sea bass (Patagonian toothfish), which is commonly replaced with cheaper white fish.

Halibut-Pacific-NOAAFisheries_edited.png

Halibut
(Pacific Halibut)

Hippoglossus stenolepis

Often substituted with flounder, arrowtooth flounder, or other flatfish species.

nassau-grouper_edited.png

Grouper
(Nassau Grouper)

Epinephelus striatus

Includes Nassau grouper and other reef groupers; frequently replaced with tilapia or other lower-value reef fish.

Cod-Atlantic-NOAAFisheries.png

Cod
(Atlantic Cod)

Gadus morhua

Atlantic cod is often substituted with Pacific cod, pollock, or other gadid species.

Salmon-Atlantic-NOAAFisheries.png

Salmon
(Atlantic Salmon)

Salmo salar

Wild-caught salmon is sometimes replaced with farmed salmon or lower-value salmonid species.

Swordfish-NOAAFisheries.png

Swordfish
(North Atlantic Swordfish)

Xiphias gladius

Sometimes substituted with shark species or other large pelagic fish.

Globally, studies consistently find that 20–40% of seafood samples are mislabeled, with some high-value reef and pelagic species showing substitution rates exceeding 50% in certain markets. Once a fish has been skinned and filleted, it becomes virtually impossible for the average consumer to visually identify the species.

Citations

Sarah Ahles, Christina A. Mireles DeWitt, and Rosalee S. Hellberg, “Seafood Species Mislabeling in the United States: A Meta-Analysis,” Food Control (2025), ScienceDirect, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956713524008272
 

Kimberly Warner et al., Oceana Study Reveals Seafood Fraud Nationwide (Washington, DC: Oceana, 2013), https://oceana.org/reports/national-seafood-fraud-testing-results/

Donna-Mareè Cawthorn and Stefano Mariani, “Global Patterns of Seafood Mislabeling,” Biological Conservation 236 (2019): 556–570, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.05.027

 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), NOAA Fisheries, accessed February, 2026, https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/
.

RTS Logo Stacked (dark).png

®

3225 S MacDill Ave Suite 129-185

Tampa Florida 33629

(833) 928-0861

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Thank you for subscribing!

  • Facebook
  • Youtube
  • Instagram

© 2025 by Tikkun HaYam - Repair the Sea

 

Tikkun HaYam - Repair the Sea Inc. is a 501(c)(3) Nonprofit Organization          EIN 87-3029570
bottom of page